Tuesday, December 15, 2015

What impact does social media have on journalism ?


Note: Note: This article was originally published on Express News blog-site on July 6th, 2014

http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/23116/what-impact-does-social-media-have-on-journalism/



What impact does social media have on journalism?

 Published: July 6, 2014
I, for one, think that social media possess immense power and influence. It is unfiltered, unadulterated and to a large extent without any buffer. What you see is what you get.
Not so long ago, there were only a select number of news communication and news transmission mediums present; be it newspapers or television based news channels. Especially speaking about the former, newspapers were constrained, time bound, and limited in terms of what to report and how to report it.
Flash forward to 2014, we frequently and repeatedly see how pivotal and crucial social media has been to the news industry with context to live coverage of a certain event. Whether TV based news mediums or print, utilising social media tools like Facebook and Twitter have become the norm. Not only are these tools used to broadcast minute by minute updates, certain events are quoted directly from users of these mediums and are relied upon by news outlets.
Suffice it to say, in the coming years, social media will only become more dominant, prevalent and more tightly integrated into how we consume news; in fact, even today, a large percentile of tech/social media savvy users consume news content via these platforms.
Here are some aspects of how social media news delivery and mechanisms operate:
Hash tags “#”:
What was once just a humble sign on your telephone that was strangely referred to as “pound” has now grown synonymously with trending news worthy topics. Used primarily on Twitter and now on many other platforms including Facebook, it is used as a great search tool. News about a particular incident is given one title and hash-tagged so all updates, from the world over, regarding the particular event are clumped together in one place for easy access. Just about anyone who has used would be able to attest to how simple this “#” content generation has become. A glance towards trending topics tells us what people are talking about on the medium and what they are interested in hearing about.
The sheer beauty of it is that be it Facebook or Twitter, it allows and enables the consumer and reader of the news to customise the news topics, event or happenings based on a particular region, city or continent to only see relevant and specific news of his or her interest.
The importance of these mediums have doubled in recent times and they keep up perfectly with the fast-paced lives of the newer generation.
From the horse’s mouth:
With social media taking over, soon enough, new agencies will not have to act as a mouth piece for anyone. Each and every person out there has the potential to cover events and news worthy incidents themselves. This changes the dynamics of what will be required of a news agency. This does not in any way mean that news outlets will become redundant, what it does in fact mean, is that journalists will have to go above and beyond to produce verified facts that have not yet reached this user base. Aside from this, it would be hard to sift through ‘news activism’ and unbiased data unless regulated news agencies are not around to clarify facts.
Yes, however, what this does mean is that news organisations are no longer the only gate keepers of news anymore.
Many a times, users get carried away in uploading facts that are not free from opinion, becoming biased, and this can become troubling in many circumstances. For example, during the recent Karachi Airport attack, many users were tweeting incorrect or exaggerated death tolls, taking names of people who were ‘presumably dead’ which became controversial and insensitive to family members who were desperate to find out what exactly the situation at the airport was like. The same thing was repeated with the subsequent Peshawar airport attack and even the Tahirul Qadri incident that recently took place in Lahore.
However, on the upside, there were some tweets uploaded by passengers stuck on the plane or in the airport who were giving us on-the-ground information which was then used by TV channels. Many news outfits reported the situation through verification and collaboration of these tweets. So in certain circumstances, these live updates by civilians can become primary sources for news mediums but that is still something that would require a lot of regulation on part of the news medium.
On one hand, it is undoubtedly emerging as a dominant platform for news consumption and transmittal. Suffice it to say that there is more than meets the eye, so we have to take the information we are extracting from these platforms with a pinch of salt. Primarily because what we consider as ‘news’ might be someone’s speculation, guess estimate or maybe some gossip floating around the grapevine.
News channels should ensure that the information they’re gathering and later running from these social media on ‘as-is basis’ is authentic, well vouched for and corroborated from numerous sources.
Hence, social media does come with a few caveats and, news channels and other news outfits, ought to exercise restraint. They should exhaust every resource under their disposal to make sure that if they’re running a story or reporting a tweet which has some significance with context to a news item, it is genuine and credible. After all, this is textbook journalism 101.
For many years, governments around the world have tried to censor the media in one form or another. With the burgeoning, almost incessant, growth of the social media in the past decade, these states have failed to fully censor and suppress the popular sentiment among their people. Therefore, it has enabled a new form of activism, ‘Social Activism’. Be it the fall of the Egyptian government in 2010 to usher in the Arab Spring or in Libya, it has played an instrumental role in rallying sustained campaigns, strikes, demonstrations etcetera, all managed via these social networks.
I, for one, think that social media possess immense power and influence. It is unfiltered, unadulterated and to a large extent without any buffer. What you see is what you get. Moreover, it is instantaneous, inexpensive and accessible to a large amount of people and exhibits the other side of the coin, when the conventional news media services are presenting the rhetoric, which has been heard, read and seen, time and time again.
In a nut shell, social media has evolved into a dynamic medium that follows the changing trends of our lives. It has become an important medium, but one that must be used with a basic sense of responsibility. It is the relative power that it possesses, that is tilting the paradigm shift in its favour. With this added power of moulding mind-sets, it may not be a bad idea to have regulations put upon these mediums so that information passed through does not in any way cause any intentional or unintentional harm to someone else. Perhaps, a few years from now, our priority should be revamping our cyber laws to include regulations in the world of social media to avoid any hassle of ‘censorship’ coming to the front again and again.
Salman Junejo

Salman Junejo

An MBA Media Sciences student at the Institute of Business Management(IOBM). An agriculturist by profession, he has a family background in politics and agriculture. He tweets @salmanjunejo (twitter.com/salmanjunejo)

Friday, December 4, 2015

When good things come in ant-sized packages

Note: This article was originally published on Express News blog-site on July 22nd, 2015





When good things come in ant-sized packages

 Published: July 22, 2015
Ant-Man is funny, enjoyable and its visual effects are an absolute pleasure to watch. PHOTO: SHOWTIME SHOWDOWN
Ant-Man is an American superhero film, produced by Marvel studios. Based upon a comic character with the same name, Ant-Man, the movie marks the conclusion of Marvel’s Phase Two of the Marvel cinematic universe. 
Paul Rudd (Scott Lang) is starring as the lead role and is projected as a skilled albeit charming and street smart thief/ex-con who is seen helping his mentor cum friend, Dr Hank Pym (Michael Douglas). Dr Pym is the one who invented the technological wonder that is the “shrinking suit”.
Photo: IMDb
Photo: IMDb
If you’re expecting Ant-Man to present the same pomp and show as other Marvel movies in the Marvel cinematic world, such as the Iron Man trilogy or the Avengers series, then you’ll definitely walk out of the cinemas disappointed.
Ant-Man takes a different and subtle route. Instead of going all guns blazing and exhibiting excessive over the top CGI visuals, it builds scenes which are equally comedic and entertaining while cleverly using CGI visuals to augment the effect of what it is literally like to be minuscule.
Photo: IMDb
One thing that can be ascertained after watching Ant-Man is that while it fits in the larger scheme of things with context to parallel storylines (Captain America, Thor, Iron Man,Avengers, etc.) presented in the Marvel Universe as a whole, on its own, Ant-Man delivers an enjoyable movie experience for the audience.
Photo: IMDb
Coming back to the action scenes in the movie, they’re great and well-thought out. Most of the action sequences that take place during the entirety of the movie will be from Ant-Man’sminiature perspective and view. They’ve innovatively shown a fight scene inside a briefcase (yes, a briefcase) that ingeniously includes iPhone-based jokes in the middle of it. It’s these little nuances and attention to detail that make this particular movie an absolute joy and delight to watch.
Photo: IMDb
Coming to the antagonist, Corey Stoll (House of Cards, The Strain) plays the role of Daren Cross and his alter ego, ‘Yellow Jacket’, who intends to use Pym’s suit for military applications. As is the case with all megalomaniacs who lust for more untapped and unrestrained power, Daren Cross is no different.
Photo: IMDb
In all honestly, after seeing his performance in House of Cards, one would expect him to knock this role out of the ball park. Unfortunately, he delivers a bland, flaccid, and a standardised run of the mill performance as one would expect from a passable villain. It’s a pity that his acting skills weren’t fully realised and utilised.
In addition, this movie also works as a comedic heist cum science fiction movie that somehow fits seamlessly in the grander cinematic experience that Marvel has to offer. Kudos to the director, Peyton Reed, who ensured that all these aspects work in tandem, without the movie falling apart.
The protagonist of the movie truly steals the show. Rudd in his rendition as Ant-Man delivers a memorable performance, which can be compared to the likes of how Robert Downey Jr truly owned the character of Iron Man and delivered a persona that was much attuned with his real self.
Similarly, Scott Lang is an offshoot of Rudd’s own personality which he has infused in his role as the world’s tiniest superhero. His comedic timing and on the spot references to other heroes in the Marvel universe is highly entertaining to watch. The supporting cast is fairly adequate, especially Michael Peña and Evangeline Lilly.
Photo: IMDb
It’s not often that movies which are not mainstream get to see the light of the day, and when they are produced and directed, either they’re panned by critics or are absolute disasters. Props to Marvel for taking a risk and not playing it ‘safe’ by producing just another movie with familiar heroes we’ve all grown accustomed to.
Ant-Man is funny, enjoyable and its visual effects are an absolute pleasure to watch. Suffice to say,
“Good things do come in small/ant-sized packages.”
Salman Junejo

Salman Junejo

An MBA Media Sciences student at the Institute of Business Management(IOBM). An agriculturist by profession, he has a family background in politics and agriculture. He tweets @salmanjunejo (twitter.com/salmanjunejo)

Saturday, November 28, 2015

House of Cards: Season 3 Review

Note: This article was originally published on Express News blog-site on March 10th, 2015

http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/26579/house-of-cards-season-3-ends-not-with-a-whimper/











While the first season of House of Cards was about climbing and ascending the corridors of power and nullifying the enemies which Frank Underwood possessed, the second season was action-packed with simultaneous sub-plots reaching their logical conclusion.
(Spoiler Alert)
The third season, however, is all about endurance – now that Frank Underwood is the president of the United States, ultimately, he has managed to bring his dream of wielding absolute power to fruition, and he now wants to leave a legacy. Any other man would have been honoured just to serve his people in the highest office known to man, but as we all know, Frank is no ordinary man. He loathes the idea of being a one-term president or as he likes to put it “The Placeholder President”.
The third season predominately focuses upon the personal relationship of the First Couple – Frank and Claire Underwood. Claire isn’t content on having her role restricted to only the First Lady. She wants to be her own woman, and for that, she fiercely lobbies and fights to become US’s ambassador to the United Nation. After failing to get a confirmation by a Senate Committee, she urges Frank to use his executive powers to make her the ambassador – a move that further deteriorates their already complicated relationship. Nonetheless, he succumbs and appoints her as the US ambassador which draws major criticism from the public and political opponents.
Photo: House of Cards Facebook page
In further episodes, as the tension in the Middle Eastern region heightens, Frank finds himself cornered by his arch rival, Viktor Petrov (Lars Mikkelsen), the president of Russia who will remind the audience of Vladimir Putin, if not in looks at least in sheer mannerisms and political strategy. Unarguably, some of the highpoints of the third season are when Frank is hosting and entertaining him during his visit to Washington DC or when Frank is in Russia carving out a power deal with his counterpart.
Photo: Netflix
Mikkelsen is par excellence in his role and epitomises the post-communism Russian mind-set as President Petrov.  It’s sad to know that we do not get to see much of him as the story turns in a direction that will leave fans feeling very… polarised.
As previously mentioned, almost more than 70 % of the show focuses upon the personal relationship of the First Couple, so much so that it starts to feel antiquated and boring. Yes, I dare say boring because season three never reaches or surpasses the highs that we witnessed in previous seasons. Suffice it to say, it is but a subdued affair, hovering in the regions of mediocrity.
Photo: Netflix
Doug Stamper (Michael Kelly) who was left for dead in the finale of the last season is back. This time though, he has a different agenda altogether. Without giving too much away, he plays a crucial role throughout the season and rectifies his previous mistakes. He single-handedly ensures that the skeletons, literal or otherwise, in President Underwood’s closet remain out of sight and out of mind.
Photo: Netflix
Other actors like Remy Dalton (Mahershala Ali), Jackie Sharp (Molly Parker), and Kate Baldwin (Kim Dickens) all are adequate. Paul Sparks, on the other hand, in his character as Thomas Yates, a writer and breakout actor who is hired to write the president’s biography cum vision employment program (AmWorks = America Works). What is mind-boggling though, is the fact that Yates is discovered after Frank reads his Monument Valley videogame review. Advertisement or not, rumour has it that the sales of the said videogame skyrocketed after the show pushed it forward. No issues here really, but did the writers of show suddenly suffer from a lack of ideas?
Photo: Netflix
The feel of power that originates as soon as you hear the theme music at the start of an episode, and resonates throughout the last two seasons, is seen to be decaying in the third season. The show has become a tad Scandal-esque leading up to its final episode. This is not a bad thing, Scandal is a good show, but House of Cards, in terms of its story and plots, was in a league of its own, having being compared to shows like Mad MenGame of Thrones, and Breaking Bad.
This feels like a downgrade.
Alas, the third season of House of Cards ends not with a bang but a whimper.